Диссертация на соискание степени доктора философии (PhD)


СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗОВАННЫХ ИСТОЧНИКОВ



жүктеу 3,12 Mb.
бет28/29
Дата07.01.2022
өлшемі3,12 Mb.
#37091
түріДиссертация
1   ...   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29
Диссертация Темербулатова ЖС

СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗОВАННЫХ ИСТОЧНИКОВ





  1. Послание Главы государства Касым-Жомарта Токаева народу Казахстана. 1 сентября 2020 г.

  2. Стратегия вхождения Казахстана в число 50 наиболее конкурентоспособных стран мира. Выступление Президента Республики Казахстан Н.А. Назарбаева на совместном заседании палат Парламента от 18 января 2006 года

  3. Porter M.E. The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. – NY: Free Press, 1985.

  4. Dunning J.H., Zhang F. Foreign direct investment and the locational competitiveness of countries // Transnational Corporations. – 2008. – vol. 17. – issue 3.

  5. Bienkowski W. How much are studies of competitiveness worth? Some critical theoretical reflections on the issue // In Papers from the Second Lancut Economic Forum. – Lancut, Poland, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892527.ch8.

  6. Singh T. Does International Trade Cause Economic Growth? A survey // The World Economy. – 2010. – vol. 33. – issue 11. – P. 1517-1564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01243.x.

  7. Frankel J.A., Romer D. Does trade cause growth? // The American Economic Review. – 1999. – vol. 89. – issue 3. – P. 379-399. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379.

  1. Adams G.F., Gangnes B., Shachmurove Y. Why is China so Competitive? Measuring and Explaining China's Competitiveness // The World Economy. – 2006.

– vol. 29(2). – P. 95-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00773.x.

  1. Aiginger K., Barenthaler-Sieber S., Vogel J. Regional Competitiveness Under New Perspectives. – Brussels: European Commission, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2685585.

  2. Ostoj I. Labor market efficiency as one of the pillars of the global competitiveness of an economy – conclusions for the labor market regimes of the EU countries // Journal of Economics and Management. – 2015. – vol. 20(2). – P. 80-92.

  3. Barro R. Human Capital and Economic Growth // The American Economic Review. – 2001. – vol. 91(2). – P. 12-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.12.

  4. Gylfason T. Norway’s wealth: Not just oil. [Electronic resource]. – 2008. –

URL: http://voxeu.org/article/norway-s-wealth-not-just-oil.

  1. Januškaite V., Užiene L. Intellectual Capital as a Factor of Sustainable Regional Competitiveness // Sustainability. – 2018. – vol. 10. – 4848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124848.

  2. Gerasymchuk V.H., Sakalosh T.V. Competitiveness and knowledge-based economy: information and communication technology impact evaluation // Business: theory and practice. – 2007. – vol VIII. – issue 4. – P. 195-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2007.28.

  3. Dima A.M., Begu L., Vasilescu M.D., Maassen M.A. The Relationship between the Knowledge Economy and Global Competitiveness in the European Union // Sustainability. – 2018. – vol. 10. – 1706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061706.

  4. Ketels C. Structural Transformation: A competitiveness-based view // African Development Bank Group. – 2017. – Working Paper No. 258. – 29 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29805.90085.

  5. Đurović-Todorović J., Janković-Milić V., Popović Z. Impact of expenditures for education on the competitiveness of the economy // Proceedings of the Faculty of Economics in East Sarajevo. – Sarajevo, 2017. – issue 14. – P. 43-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS1714043D.

  6. Pyankova S., Troyanskaya M., Tyurina Yu. Digital Economy as A Factor for Increasing the Competitiveness of Countries and Regions // Talent Development & Excellence. – 2020. – vol.12. – No. 2s. – P. 1368-1380.

  7. Кузьмина Е.Ю., Соклакова И.В., Сурат И.Л. Инновационное развитие как фактор конкурентоспособности национальной экономики // Вестник университета. – 2020. - № 2. – С. 63-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277- 2020-2-63-67.

  8. Баймуратов У.Б. Проблемы конкурентоспособности национальной экономики в контексте мировых тенденций // Конкурентоспособность: теория, методология, практика. – 2008. – С. 66-82.

  9. Сагадиев К.А. Проблемы конкурентоспособности национальной экономики. Проблемы устойчивого экономического развития в условиях глобализации: в 2-х т. – Алматы: ИЭ МОН РК, 2003. – Т. 1. – 89 с.

  10. Нурмуханова Г.Ж. Формирование конкурентоспособной экономики Республики Казахстан: методологические подходы, проблемы и перспективы развития (на примере промышленности): диссертация на соискание ученой степени доктора экономических наук. – Алматы, 2008. – 331 с.

  11. Нypмyxaмeтoв Н.Н. Эвoлюция тeopeтичecкиx взглядoв нa

«кoнкypeнцию» и «кoнкypeнтocпocoбнocть» // Вecтник Кaзaxcтaнcкo- Aмepикaнcкoгo cвoбoднoгo yнивepcитeтa. – 2008. - №4. – С. 21-28.

  1. Сабден О. Конкурентоспособность национальной экономики: критерии оценки и пути повышения. – Алматы: Экономика, 2007. – 175 с.

  2. Хусаинов Б. Глобализация, Транснационализация, Интеграция. – Алматы: ИЭ МОН РК, 2012. – 312 с.

  3. Мельдаханова М.К. Современная концепция человеческого капитала в экономической теории // Матер. междунар. науч. конф. «Формирование и развитие конкурентоспособного человеческого капитала в Казахстане». – Алматы: Институт экономики КН МОН РК, 2010. – С. 49-53.

  4. Porter M.E., Ketels C.M. UK competitiveness: Moving to the next stage // DTI Economic Paper 3. – Department of Trade and Industry, London, 2003.

  5. Budd L., Hirmis A.K. Conceptual framework for regional competitiveness

// Regional Studies. – 2004. – vol. 38(9). – P. 1015-1028.

1992.


  1. Technology and the Economy: The Key Relationships / OECD. – Paris,




  1. The global competitiveness report 2014–2015 / World Economic Forum. –

Geneva, 2015.

  1. The global competitiveness report 1995–1996 / World Economic Forum. –

Geneva, 1996.

  1. IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2014 / IMD World Competitiveness Center. – Lausanne, 2014.

  2. European competitiveness Report 2006 / Commission Staff Working Paper SEC. – 2006.

  3. Building a competitive America. The First Report to the President and Congress / US Competitiveness Policy Council. – Washington DC, 1992.

  4. Porter M.E. The competitive advantage of nations. – New York: Free Press,

1998.

  1. Bhawsar P., Chattopadhyay U. Competitiveness: review, reflections and

directions // Global Bussiness Review. – 2015. – vol. 16(4). – P. 665-679.

  1. IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2011 / IMD World Competitiveness Center. – Lausanne, 2014. – 495 р.

  2. Stanovnik P., Kovacic A. Measuring competitiveness of national economies with emphasis on Slovenia / Working paper No. 6, Institute for Economic Research.

  • Ljubljana, 2000.

  1. Krugman P. Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession // Foreign Affairs. –

1994. – vol. 73(2). – P. 28–44.

  1. Dunning J., Bannerman E., Lundan S.M. Competitiveness and industrial policy in Northern Ireland. – Northern Ireland Research Council, Belfast, 1998.

  2. Huggins R. World knowledge competitiveness index. – Robert Huggins Associates, Pontypridd, 2004.

  3. Dollar D., Wolf E. The Global Competitive // Journal of International Economics. – 2003. - № 27(3–4). – P. 199-220.

  4. Hayek F.A. Competition as a Discovery Procedure. – Tiibingen: Freiburger Studien, 1969.

  5. Dunn M. The Economic of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and Organization // American Economic Review. – 1990. - № 80. – P. 511-528.

  6. Shangquan G. Economic Globalization: Trends, Risks and Risk Prevention.

  • UN, CDP Background Paper No. 1 [Electronic resource] – 2000. – URL: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/cdp/cdp_background_papers/bp2000

_1.pdf.

  1. Lagarde C. Making Globalization Work for All. – Toronto, 2016.

  2. Oxfam International [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/reward-work-not-wealth.

  3. Carayannis E., Grigoroudis E. Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: implications for policy and practice // J Technol Transf. – 2014. – vol. 39. – P. 199-218. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9295-2.

  1. Fabus M. Foreign direct investment and its impact on the Slovak republic’s

economy // Economics and management of national economy. – 2014. – vol. 9-10(1).

– P. 42-45.



  1. Acemoglu D., Autor D., Dorn D., Hanson G.H., Price B. Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s // Journal of Labor Economics. – 2016. – vol. 34(S1). – P. S141-S198. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1086/682384.

  1. Li H., Li L., Wu B., Yanyan X. The End of Cheap Chinese Labor // Journal of Economic Perspectives. – 2012. – vol. 26(4). – P. 57-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.57.

  2. Ülengin F., Kabak O., Önsel S., Aktaş E., Parker B.R. The Competitiveness of Nations and Implications for Human Development // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. – 2011. – vol. 45. – P. 16-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2010.10.001.

  3. Šegota A., Tomljanović M., Huđek I. Contemporary approaches to measuring competitiveness – the case of EU member states // Zb. rad. Ekon. fak. Rij.

– 2017. – vol. 35. – no. 1. – P. 123-150. DOI: 10.18045/zbefri.2017.1.123.

  1. Titova N. History of Economic Studies. – Moscow: VLADOS, 1997. – 288

p.
351 p.


  1. Marshall A. Principles of political economy. – Moscow: Progress, 1984. –




  1. Enright M.J. Why Clusters are the Way to Win the Game? // Word Link. –

1992. – vol. 5. – P. 24-25.

  1. Porter M. Competitive Strategy: A Methodology for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. – Moscow: Alpina Business Books, 2005. – 454 p.

  2. Белкин В.Г., Хлыстова О.В. Проблемы использования ресурсной теории в стратегическом управлении // Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. – 2012. - № 2. – С. 22-27.

  3. Оболенский В.П. Оценка конкурентоспособности российской экономики // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. – 2008. – № 4. – С. 3- 10.

  4. Вохмянин И.А. Конкурентные преимущества отраслей экономики Вологодской области // Вопросы территориального развития. – 2016. - № 2 (32). 61 Birnie E., Johnston R., Heery L., Ramsey E. A critical review of competitiveness measurement in Northern Ireland // Regional Studies. – 2019. – vol.

53(10). – P. 1494-1504.

  1. Kitson M., Martin R., Tyler P. Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept? // Regional Studies. – 2004. – vol. 38. – no. 9.

  2. Wokun R., Krejcova N.M. The Competitiveness of Regions in the EU. Conference Proceedings 16th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences. – European Regional Science Association, 2013. – ERSA conference papers ersa12p788.

  3. European Competitiveness Report, Enterprise and Industry Publications / European Comission. – Brussels, 2004.

  1. Turok I. Cities, Regions and Competitiveness // Regional Studies. – 2003. –

vol. 29. – no. 8. – P. 1069-1083.

  1. Alexa D., Cismas L.M., Rus A.V., Pop Silaghi M.L. Economic growth, competitiveness and convergence in the European regions. A spatial model estimation // Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research. – 2019. – vol. 53(1). – P. 107-124.

  2. Dijkstra L., Annoni P. EU regional competitiveness index. – Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2013.

  3. Boschma R. Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective // Regional Studies. – 2004. – vol. 38(9). – P. 1001-1014.

  4. Kresl P., Ietri D. Urban Competitiveness: Theory and Practice, 1st edition. –

London: Routledge, 2014. – 158 p.

  1. The global competitiveness report 2019 / World Economic Forum. –

Geneva, 2019.

  1. WCY Methodology 2019 / IMD World Competitiveness Center. –

Lausanne, 2019.

  1. Mukhamediyev B., Ilyassova Zh. Methods for assessing the competitiveness of the national economy // The Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration. – 2018. – vol. 1(123). – P. 203-211.

  2. The global competitiveness report 2006–2007 / World Economic Forum. –

Geneva, 2007.

  1. The global competitiveness report 2009–2010 / World Economic Forum. –

Geneva, 2010.

  1. Токсанова А.Н. Исследование рейтинга глобальной конкурентоспособности РК по методике IMD. – Астана: АО «Институт экономических исследований» Министерства экономики и бюджетного планирования РК, 2008. – 137 с. - [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.minplan.kz/upload/iblock/1d2/ imd_vnqslimjnyrsaprtvvlrgacyel.doc.

  2. IMD World Competitiveness ranking 2020 / IMD World Competitiveness Center. – Lausanne, 2020. – 495 р.

  3. World Development Indicators of World Bank: official website. – URL: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/.

  4. The stactical portal for market data: official website. – URL: statista.com. 79 United Nations development programme: official website. – URL:

https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home.html.

  1. Economic Research of Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis: official website. –

URL: https://research.stlouisfed.org/.

  1. Brent Crude Oil Price Charts [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://oilprice.com/oil-price-charts/46.

  2. Baltagi B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 5th ed. – London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2013.

  3. Sun K., Zhu Y., Xu Y. Research on The Method of GIS-Based Analysis on Agricultural Regional Competitive Industries // IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. – Springer, Boston, MA, 2009. – vol. 293.

  4. Гнидченко А.А. Динамика отраслевой структуры российского экспорта: оценка перспектив по критерию конкурентоспособности: Автореф. канд. дис. экон. наук. – Москва, 2015.

  5. Balassa B. Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage. –

The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 1965. – P. 99-123.

  1. Koisova E., Grmanova E., Skrovankova K., Kostrova J. Competitiveness of Regions in the Visegrad Group Countries // Engineering Economics. – 2019. – vol. 30(2). – P. 203-210.

  2. Holis Y.M., Syabri I., Prabatmojo H. An Examination of Regional Competitiveness: Early Findings from Banten, Indonesia // The 4th PlanoCosmo International Conference IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. – 2018. – no. 158

  3. Huggins R. Creating a UK Competitiveness Index: Regional and Local Benchmarking // Regional Studies. – 2003. – vol. 37(1). – P. 89-96.

  4. Bronisz U., Heijman W., Miszczuk A. Regional competitiveness in Poland: Creating an index // Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft. – 2008. – vol. 28. – issue 2.

– P. 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-008-0026-y

  1. Консорциум AV-Group: официальный сайт. – Режим доступа: http://av- group.ru/av-strategy/av-rci/.

  2. Mukhamediyev B.M., Temerbulatova Zh.S. Impact of macroeconomic factors on the competitiveness of national economies // The Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration. – 2020. – vol. 2(132). – P. 24-32.

  3. Delgado M., Ketels C., Porter M.E., Stern S. The determinants of national competitiveness. – National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012. – No. w18249.

  4. World Integrated Trade Solution of World Bank: official website. – URL: https://wits.worldbank.org/

  5. Mukhamediyev B.M., Temerbulatova Zh.S. The Impact of Oil Prices on the Global Competitiveness of National Economies // International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. – 2019. – vol. 9(6). – P. 45-50.

  6. Chirisa I.E., Mumba A., Dirwai S.O. A review of the evolution and trajectory of the African union as an instrument of regional integration // SpringerPlus. – 2014. – vol. 3. – 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-101. 96 Soomer J. Why regional integration benefits? // Eastern Caribbean Currency

Union’s Financial Literacy Month Programme. – 2003. – P. 1-5.

  1. Гурова И.П. Мировая экономика. – М.: Омега-Л, 2008. – 198 с.

  2. Колесов В.П., Осьмова М.Н. Мировая экономика. Экономика зарубежных стран. – М.: Флинт, 2000.

  3. Balassa B. The theory of economic integration. – London: George Allen and Unwin, 1961.

  4. Темирбекова А.Б., Ускеленова А.Т., Болуспаев Ш.А., Алдабергенов Н.А. Влияние интеграции на конкурентоспособность национальной экономики (на примере АПК) // ЕЭИ. – 2015. - №1(26).

  5. Abadie A., Gardeazabal J. The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country // American Economic Review. – 2003. – vol. 93 (1). – P. 112-132.

  6. Abadie A., Diamond A., Hainmueller J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program // Journal of the American Statistical Association. – 2010. – vol. 105 (490).

– P. 493-505.

  1. Demko I., Jaenicke E.C. Impact of European Union–U.S. Organic Equivalency Arrangement on U.S. Exports // Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. – 2018. – vol. 40 (3). – P. 482-501. DOI: 10.1093/aepp/ppx048

  2. Saia A. Choosing the open sea: The cost to the UK of staying out of the euro // Journal of International Economics. – 2017. – vol. 108. – P. 82-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.06.001.

  3. Nwe K., Kawata K., Yoshida Y. Recent Political Change in Myanmar and Its Impact on her Economic Growth // Asian Economic Journal. – 2018. – vol. 32(1).

– P. 39-54. DOI: 10.1111/asej.12141.

  1. Campos N.F., Coricelli F., Moretti L. Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe // Journal of Monetary Economics. – 2019. – vol. 103. – P. 88-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.08.001

  2. Hosny A.S. Algeria’s Trade with GAFTA Countries: A Synthetic Control Approach // Transition Studies Review. – 2012. – vol. 19. – P. 35-42. DOI: 10.1007/s11300-012-0228-4

  3. Aytug H., Kutuk M.M., Oduncu A., Togan S. Twenty Years of the EU- Turkey Customs Union: A Synthetic Control Method Analysis // Journal of Common Market Studies. – 2017. – vol. 55(3). – P. 419-431. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12490.

  4. Gabrielczak P., Serwach T. Economic integration and export complexity: the case of Slovakia // Lodz Economics Working papers. – 2017. – vol. 6.

  5. Stojcic N., Vojinic P., Aralica Z. Trade liberalization and export transformation in new EU member states // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. – 2018. – vol. 47. – P. 114-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.08.004.

  6. Direction of Trade Statistics [Electronic resource]. – IMF Data. – URL: https://data.imf.org/?sk=9d6028d4-f14a-464c-a2f2- 59b2cd424b85&sId=1409151240976.

  7. CEPII Gravity [Elecronic resource]. – CEPII database on the World Economy. – URL: http://www.cepii.fr/cepii/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=8.

  8. Barone G., David F., de Blasio G. Boulevard of broken dreams. The end of EU funding (1997: Abruzzi, Italy) // Regional Science and Urban Economics. – 2016.

– vol. 60. – P. 31-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.06.001

  1. Mukhamediyev B.M., Temerbulatova Zh.S., Ilyashova G.K. The effect of Eurasian Economic Union on trade of Kazakhstan: impact evaluation using the Synthetic Control Method // Economics: strategy and practice. – 2020. – vol. 2(15). – P. 55-64.

  2. Metallurgical portal: official website. – URL: http://stalevarim.ru/

  3. Temerbulatova Zh.S., Mukhamediyev B.M., Sadykhanova G.A., Salibekova P.K. Assessment of Industries with Competitive Advantages of Kazakhstan and Eurasian Economic Union Member Countries // Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA). – Granada, Spain, 2019. – P. 4918-4926.

  4. Комитет по статистике Министерства национальной экономики РК:

официальный сайт. – Режим доступа: http://stat.gov.kz/.

  1. Zhidebekkyzy A., Sagiyeva R.K., Temerbulatova Zh.S. Assessing the competitiveness of Kazakhstan regions: creating an index // Proceedings of E3S Web of Conferences. – Almaty, 2020. – vol. 159. – 05002.

  2. Beny L.N., Cook L.D. Metals or Management? Explaining Africa's Recent Economic Growth Performance // American Economic Review. – 2009. – vol. 99(2).

– P. 268-74. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.2.268.

  1. Frankel J. The Natural Resource Curse: A Survey. - Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010. – NBER Working Paper, No. 15836.

  2. Conceição P., Fuentes R., Levine S. Managing natural resources for human development in low-income countries // International Policy Conference Proceedings. Competitiveness and Diversification: Strategic Challenges in a Petroleum-Rich Economy. – Ghana, 2011. – P. 83-92.

  3. Kuznets S. Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel. – 1971.

  4. Договор о Евразийском экономическом союзе. – Астана, 29 мая 2014

года.

  1. Мутанов Г.М., Сагиева Р.К., Жупарова А.С., Сахариева А.С.

Инновационный Казахстан: монография. – Алматы: Қазақ университеті, 2015. – 150 с.

  1. ОЭСР. Меры региональной политики по содействию диверсификации и росту производительности в Казахстане. – Париж: OECD Publishing, 2020. – 86 c.

  2. European Commission. The role of clusters in smart specialisation strategies. – 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2777/43211.

жүктеу 3,12 Mb.

Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29



©g.engime.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз
    Басты бет
рсетілетін қызмет
халықаралық қаржы
Астана халықаралық
қызмет регламенті
бекіту туралы
туралы ережені
орталығы туралы
субсидиялау мемлекеттік
кеңес туралы
ніндегі кеңес
орталығын басқару
қаржы орталығын
қаржы орталығы
құрамын бекіту
неркәсіптік кешен
міндетті құпия
болуына ерікті
тексерілу мемлекеттік
медициналық тексерілу
құпия медициналық
ерікті анонимді
Бастауыш тәлім
қатысуға жолдамалар
қызметшілері арасындағы
академиялық демалыс
алушыларға академиялық
білім алушыларға
ұйымдарында білім
туралы хабарландыру
конкурс туралы
мемлекеттік қызметшілері
мемлекеттік әкімшілік
органдардың мемлекеттік
мемлекеттік органдардың
барлық мемлекеттік
арналған барлық
орналасуға арналған
лауазымына орналасуға
әкімшілік лауазымына
инфекцияның болуына
жәрдемдесудің белсенді
шараларына қатысуға
саласындағы дайындаушы
ленген қосылған
шегінде бюджетке
салығы шегінде
есептелген қосылған
ұйымдарға есептелген
дайындаушы ұйымдарға
кешен саласындағы
сомасын субсидиялау