95
PARTNERSHIP
FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT,
KAZAKHSTAN, 2016-2020
To enable both the Government and the United Nations
system to take advantage of new opportunities and to
adjust expectations in response to changes in the external
environment, the high-level Steering Committee will, each
year, organize a Joint PFD Annual Review under agreed
terms. Results groups will provide inputs based not only
on the status of JWP implementation but on feedback
from bilateral discussions between individual agencies
and their line ministry counterparts. These procedures will
nurture an institutional culture of results-based reporting,
while facilitating validation of best practice/lessons
learned during PFD progress, to assist in preparing new
annual work plans.
A PFD report will be produced at least once during the
cycle, drawing on available evidence of the UNCT’s
contribution towards its Outcomes. More than one
progress
report may be produced, if this adds value;
timings will be determined jointly by the UN and the
Government.
An independent evaluation will be carried out to assess
overall achievement in terms of relevance, efficiency,
effectiveness and sustainability. The Outcomes and
indicators elaborated in the PFD Results and Resources
Framework will be used to measure progress. These
evaluations will allow the United Nations system
and its national partners
to incorporate learning and
recommendations into the design and planning of
the next framework. The cost of the evaluation will be
budgeted for the third year of PFD implementation and
will be cost-shared among participating UN agencies.
V. MONITORING AND
EVALUATION MECHANISMS
The United Nations system and the Government are committed to rigorously monitoring PFD
progress, using key indicators, accompanied by baselines, targets and means of verification
formulated within the PFD Results and Resources Framework (for each Outcome under the
three Pillars). Instruments will include
periodic Government surveys, supplementary studies,
joint periodic programme reviews, and independent assessments and evaluations. Given
possible differences between official data and international estimations, the UNCT will refer to
alternative sources of information, such as Concluding Observations of international human
rights treaty bodies, as well as official data.
96
PARTNERSHIP FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT, KAZAKHSTAN, 2016-2020
ANNEX A: PFD RESULTS AND RESOURCES FRAMEWORK 2016-2020
PILLAR 1: REDUCED DISPARITIES AND IMPROVED HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Outc
omes
Indic
at
or
s, Baseline, T
ar
get
Me
ans of
Verific
ation
Risks and
As
sumptions
Role of P
artner
s
Indic
ative
Resour
ces, USD
Outc
ome 1.1:
Impr
ov
ed equit
able
access to integr
ated
quality social ser
-
vices (health, edu
-
ca
tion, social pr
o-
tection, legal e
t al.)
for
the
popula
tion,
including
for
social
-
ly
vulner
able
and
disadv
ant
aged indi
-
viduals and gr
oups
IOM
UNAIDS
UNESCO
UNFP
A
UNHCR
UNICEF
UNODC
UN W
omen
WHO
Indicator 1A:
Percentage of households (HHs) satisfied with
the quality and effectiveness of public service
delivery
Baseline (2014):
- P
er
cent
age of vulner
able households s
atisfi
ed
with the qualit
y and ef
fe
ctivenes
s of social tr
ans
-
fer
s, pensions and o
ther social benefits:
HHs in urban/rur
al ar
eas – 20.8%/34%
HHs with childr
en – 28.9%
HHs with unemploy
ed – 31.9%
HHs with PWD – 39.4%
-P
er
cent
age of HHs s
atisfi
ed with he
alth services
deliver
ed by the s
ta
te he
alth c
ar
e s
ys
tem:
HHs in urban/rur
al ar
eas – 21.1%/29.8%
HHs with childr
en – 25.7%
HHs with unemploy
ed – 26.4%
HHs with PWD – 32.4%
- P
er
cent
age of HHs s
atisfi
ed with pr
e-school
educ
ation:
HHs in urban/rur
al ar
eas – 30%/46.3%
HHs with childr
en – 45.6%
HHs with unemploy
ed – 40.2%
HHs with PWD – 40.5%
- P
er
cent
age of HHs s
atisfi
ed
with int
er
action with
la
w enf
or
cement bodies:
HHs in urban/rur
al ar
eas – 10.4%/20.3%
HHs with childr
en – 16%
HHs with unemploy
ed – 18.2%
HHs with PWD – 16.2%
Fr
om 2016 the
household survey
on «qualit
y of lif
e»
will be c
arried out
by the Commit
tee
on s
ta
tis
tic
s e
ver
y
2-3 y
ear
s.
The curr
ent finan
-
cial and
ec
onomic
crisis c
ould f
or
ce
the
Go
vernment
to
cut
public
expend
-
itur
e, which
w
ould
nega
tively a
ffe
ct
the qualit
y of so
-
cial services,
espe
-
cially f
or the mos
t
vulner
able and
dis
adv
ant
aged
Public services ha
ve
limit
ed c
apacit
y in
ensuring equit
a-
ble acces
s and f
o-
cus on the gener
al
popula
tion r
ather
than on those who
ar
e
vulner
able
or
dis
adv
ant
aged
Impr
ovement of
he
alth s
ta
tus and, in
particular
, r
educed
pr
ema
tur
e mort
ali
-
ty due t
o NCDs, will
depend on identify
-
ing e
vidence-based
multi-se
ct
or
al ac
-
tions
and
inv
olving
se
ct
or
s
other
than
he
alth
The minis
tries of
He
alth and Social
De
velopment, of
Educ
ation and
Science,
of
Jus
tice,
and
of the Int
erior will
ensur
e the a
vailabilit
y
of he
alth, social, ed
-
uc
ation and legal ser
-
vices f
or the popula
-
tion and set s
tandar
ds
for services
Minis
tr
y of
He
alth and Social
De
velopment and
the futur
e He
alth
Insur
ance
Fund
will
ha
ve
major
roles
in bo
th monit
oring
the indic
at
or and
designing legisla
-
tion/ r
egula
tions t
o
remo
ve barrier
s and
to be pr
o-poor (pr
o-
viding pr
ot
ection
fr
om financial risk
rela
ting t
o he
alth
expenditur
e).
500,000 (IOM)
276,000
(UNAIDS)
370,000
(UNESCO)
3,050,000
(UNFP
A)
1,522,000
(UNHCR)
5,297,000
(UNICEF)
2,000,000
(UNODC)
900,000 (UN
W
omen)
2,500,000 (WHO)
